Skip to main content

Another Blog Post About CARP. This Time It’s Personal!

https://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/2187718-181/some-fishermen-complain-that-carp
CARP, not referring to a fish, but rather it’s an acronym for Contrast, Alignment, Repetition, Proximity. Sometimes referred as CRAP! Or so I have found by doing a brief search for CARP on Google. There are already so many great resources out there describing CARP, however I first learned about it in Presentation Zen: Simple Ideas on Presentation Design and Delivery by Garr Reynolds (2008). Check out the .pdf describing CARP from pages in “Presentation Zen.”

Somehow I managed 5 years of design school in the early 2000’s without hearing about this acronym. It’s likely the acronym did not reach the height of popularity until after I graduated. Nevertheless, I entered design school for ILT grad studies in the twenty-teens and picked up where I left off in Joni Dunlap’s “Creative Designs” course. These CARP principles were already burned into my brain but one has always stuck out for me ̶ CONTRAST!

During undergraduate design schooling we would often create sketches and designs to critique by posting them on a wall and standing back 15-20 feet to talk about them. Often, a quick glance would reveal glaring errors in application of these principles. The biggest culprit ̶ CONTRAST! Standing at this distance the images would fade into the background if there was not the appropriate usage of contrast.

Professor Tony Kawanari would say it again, and again, in a myriad of different ways, “MORE CONTRAST!” Sometimes with a stack up papers rolled up to form a trumpet over his lips. But my favorite was always the exclamation combined with a katana slice with a metal cork-back ruler!



Tony is a Japanese American man who lovingly shared his culture with his students in combination with his love for design and humor. We were all privileged to learn from him and I will never forget about contrast as perhaps the most critical of design principles.
Without contrast, the rest of the principles are moot because a viewer may not be able to see the design in order to evaluate anything.

 In regards to the discussion of webinars, for the course I am currently taking at University of Colorado Denver, contrast likely plays a strong role in the success of the presentation. The slides in a webinar, similarly, are like looking at something far away to critique because the view-port presentation window is only a portion of the screen. Additionally, the quality of this presentation is limited to the available bandwidth for the attendees and the video quality of the webinar platform. Case and point ̶ contrast matters!

This does not suggest the other principles don’t matter or aren’t as integral to a design presentation. The combination of these elements working together usually produce the best visual results. Ultimately, the purpose is to make it easy for the viewer to understand the message behind the graphics without being confused by lack of quality use of principles. To the point that it looks effortless or subconscious. It’s likely most people take this for granted, but behind every good design there’s one-hundred visual experiments and one-thousand pixel nudges. There’s no perfect equation to apply CARP well. The best way to learn how to do so well is to practice. Eventually, the application becomes instinctual.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VR ‘Redefining’ How We Design

SAMR: REDEFINITION. Image courtesy of Christina Moore 2017. In recent years virtual reality (VR) technologies have gained popularity for enhancement of a myriad of industries and experiences. It’s hard to dispute VR has the potential to transform. It’s exciting to consider exploring these technologies for the purpose of education, but before putting VR into practice in the classroom, it’s important to apply the study of theory to VR potential. The SAMR model (substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition) is a great way to apply rather basic theory to VR tech. Although it’s possible VR practitioners and learners can traverse SAMR, based on how VR is used, “redefinition” may be the most impactful way to demonstrate use of these technologies for learning. Redefinition, in regards to SAMR, refers to the ability for technology to “create tasks and ways of learning that were previously inconceivable.” (Technology Is Learning 2014) From the perspective of a CAD and Int...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Discourse and Creativity Express Meaning

Moving from literacy and ‘new literacies’ to D iscourse. In chapter one of New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning Ed by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel . I learned about literacy as a historical concept and a social practice. I also learned about new literacies as ‘paradigmatic’ and ‘ontological’ (Lankshear & Knobel, 2011, p. 27). In chapter two I began to learn more about literacy as a social practice through Discourses and encoded texts. “Hence, literacies are ‘socially recognized ways in which people generate, communicate, and negotiate meanings, as members of Discourses, through the medium of encoded texts.”  (Lankshear & Knobel, 2011, p. 50). As a social practice one can think of literacy as observable ‘things’ humans do with their bodies and minds to create meaning. Lankshear and Knobel cite the work of Scribner and Cole to describe these practices as “consisting of three components: technology, knowledge, and skills. (ibid,: 2...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Everyday Remix Practices of Teachers: A Critique of Christopher Emdin: Hip-Hop and the Remix of Science Education

Christopher Emdin: Hip-Hop and the Remix of Science Education UC Denver digital storytelling students wishing to comment on this critique:   Although I would love it if everyone had the time to watch the full youtube video, you can get ‘the just’ of this remix practice within 5-10 minutes of watching if you would like to participate in comments. Please don’t shy away because of the length of the video. Critique Format As part of the continued practice in digital storytelling, in INTE 5340 MA ILT at CU Denver, I will consume digital stories and offer critiques. Until now the course has focused on Jason Ohler’s assessment traits as criterions to assess stories. For the remainder of the critiques in the course, I will focus on “everyday remix practices” as described in the Lankshear and Knobel text New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning Third Ed by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel , on pages 127-140. Introduction In efforts to transition and answe...
Post a Comment
Read more